Tag Archives: oral motor therapy

Explore oral motor therapy tools and techniques that enhance speech, feeding, and respiratory function by strengthening muscles involved in the mouth and face.

Oral Motor Treatment Strategies: Part 2

On June 16, 2020, Therapro hosted an overwhelmingly popular webinar presented by Dr. Kate Barlow on the topic of Oral Motor Treatment Strategies. As one viewer stated:

This was a totally amazing webinar on oral motor feeding. I learned so much information, and Kate was a wonderful speaker.” DSM

Dr. Barlow is an Assistant Professor at American International College (see her full bio here).   In part one of this blog series, we recapped some great takeaways from Dr. Barlow’s June 16 webinar; one of those takeaways was that all children should be screened for feeding disorders.  In this blog post, we will dive deeper into the screening and assessment strategies Dr. Barlow shared with viewers during the webinar.  

Dr. Barlow shared great tips, resources, and strategies for appropriately screening and assessing feeding disorders, noting that a good assessment is the driving force behind a good treatment plan. Dr. Barlow identified key areas to assess: lip closure and strength, reaction to gum massage, posterior cheek strength, tongue range of motion and strength, jaw strength, motor planning, and sensory assessments when appropriate. Dr. Barlow shared a decision tree that she created, explaining that it is a great way to ensure all relevant areas are covered during the screening and assessment process. With this she highlighted key questions to ask caregivers during the screening process, like the three Ps: “pain, past medical history and poop.” Other recommended questions to ask included: 

  • Is the child eating more than 10 foods?
  • How is the child being fed?
  • Where does the child eat?

Dr. Barlow’s experience in the area of pediatric feeding was clearly evident in some great pointers she offered when assessing feeding difficulties. For example:

  • Always ask about teeth brushing because of the correlation between difficulties with brushing teeth and difficulties with feeding.
  • Be sure to check that the child’s nutrition is adequate, even if they are at an appropriate weight. 
  • Monitoring oxygen saturation, temperature changes, and respiratory rates during feeding can give you clear indicators of difficulty during feeding.

Viewers left this webinar with an awareness of how crucial it is to understand the deficit areas that are causing the feeding problem. That understanding is a key piece in developing an appropriate treatment plan. We will discuss Dr. Barlow’s treatment recommendations in part three of this three-part recap of the Oral Motor Treatment Strategies webinar.

 A recommended resource for evaluating sensory based difficulties is the The Sensory Processing Measure. The home form is completed by a child’s parent or caregiver and provides norm-referenced standard scores for two higher level integrative functions-praxis and social participation-and five sensory systems – visual, auditory, tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular.

Interventions for Toddlers and School-Age Children with Feeding Difficulties

Kerry Pearl, MS, CCC-SLPKerry Pearl, MS, CCC-SLP, Therapro’s Saturday Seminar speaker on February 11th   drew attendees representing a variety of backgrounds who work with children having feeding problems. She spoke about Interventions for Toddlers and School-Age Children with Feeding Difficulties to a rapt audience.

Kerry, of Boston Children’s Hospital, specializes in evaluation and treatment of pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders as the Coordinator of the Food School feeding therapy program. Her goal for today’s seminar was to provide information about feeding principles applicable in various settings and how to promote successful oral feeding across disciplines. Kerry has generously made her PowerPoint slides available at this link.

Kerry’s talk covered a lot of ground beginning with the components of the Clinical Feeding Evaluation, which include obtaining the child’s medical history, feeding history, and goals of the caregiver.  She stressed that it is important to understand where the child is in terms of his/her skill level and use that as a point of where to begin with treatment for building feeding skills. An interesting thing to consider when evaluating a school-age child, is the importance of exploring what motivates the child…for example, does the child eat their lunch quickly so he/she doesn’t miss recess?  Another important factor in evaluation is knowing the child’s eating environment, because it is essential for feeding success.  This includes positioning in an appropriate supportive seat that supports the child’s hips, knees, and feet at 90° angles, like a Height Right Chair. When considering the mealtime environment, Kerry advocated establishing a routine so the child knows what to expect, providing clear instructions, and a visual schedule.

Evaluation may identify a number of target areas that need to be prioritized with input from caregivers.  Kerry recommended planning intervention in 10 week blocks, which provides time to target several goals and subsequently focus on the skill deficit areas when they become more apparent as treatment sessions progress. Working with the child’s team is important in a number of areas including when it comes to prioritizing what foods to introduce with the child’s dietitian. When initiating therapy, discharge criteria must be in place so that the child’s set, measurable goals can be reviewed to determine whether the therapy has been successful.

A distinctive feature of Kerry’s presentation was her discussion of two intervention models: 1) Operant Conditioning and 2) Sensory Desensitization.  She distinguished between the two approaches by discussing how operant conditioning targets behavior directly, is child focused as well as parent focused where the therapist consults with parents to help the parent change the structure of mealtime and nutrition. It involves expanding the foods a child eats, improving volume of intake, and targeting specific behavior or skills. A prompt and immediate reinforcer (like a Wind-Up Toy) is given in treatment so that the eating behavior becomes linked to the prompt and the reward. In this approach, the child builds skills but must overcome their fear associated with eating. Individual therapy is provided and “homework” is given.

In the Sensory Desensitization approach, the child develops skills while gradually adapting, with the focus being on changing mealtime behavior by using modeling and positive reinforcement. In this model, the child progresses through “steps to eating” that include: tolerating the presence of food, interacting with the food, smelling the food, touching the food, tasting the food, and finally eating the food. The end result is that the child experiences less stress around foods and is more willing to try foods. This approach can occur in either individual or group sessions.

When selecting the approach that will be most effective for a particular child, Kerry recommended bearing in mind the child’s current skills and sensory profile as well as family concerns/goals. Considerations should include the child’s nutritional status, oral motor skills, and sensory processing ability.

Kerry provided many specific examples of therapeutic activities throughout her talk. Some examples of strategies she discussed to develop chewing skills included lateral placement in the mouth of tools such as the Baby Safe Feeder filled with chewable foods, Chewy Tubes, Y-Chew, or Theratubing dipped in pureed food, progressing to placing small pieces of dissolvable food inside the hollow tubes.  Using a Chu Buddy can help the child keep track of the chewy so it is always available.

Kerry’s thoughtful, organized, chock-full presentation provided us with a practical way to approach feeding difficulties in toddlers and young children. Her anecdotes, videos, and tidbits of interesting information gleaned from her extensive experience as a feeding specialist complemented her presentation and were greatly appreciated by all who attended her seminar.

As you can see from some the following comments, Kerry’s seminar left attendees with much information and useful treatment strategies:

“The seminar was well organized & relatable. Examples were provided. I enjoyed the contrast of therapy styles & when each were appropriate.” Lauren P., Speech/Language Pathologist

“I would recommend this seminar to a colleague! I loved the specific interventions discussed. I look forward to applying them in my practice.”  Marianna Q., Occupational Therapist

“This was a unique learning topic, and I was thrilled for this opportunity to gain more understanding and techniques.” Marisa G., Child Development Specialist

“It was very informative in many ways – I appreciated the intervention strategies given & how they should be implemented. Also, it was helpful to hear how to identify which intervention is best for individual children.”

Amy V., Occupational Therapist

“Very interesting from a teacher’s point of view. It broadened my understanding of the issue & encouraged me to reflect on how the issue can impact classroom learning.” Maura M., Teacher

Thank you, Kerry!

Filomena Connor, MS, OTR/L

Exploring Chewy Tubes Oral Motor Tools

The Chewy Tubes Oral Motor Tools family offers a wide range of products designed to support oral motor deChewy Tubes Oral Motor Toolsvelopment and sensory needs in children and adults. These safe, durable, and versatile tools are ideal for improving chewing, biting, and self-regulation skills, making them an essential part of occupational and speech therapy. Whether used for sensory input or as part of a therapeutic intervention, Chewy Tubes help individuals develop the necessary oral motor skills to thrive in daily activities.

Which of the Chewy Tubes oral motor tools is right for your child? With this guide, you’ll be able to pick the perfect resistance and style.

Yellow (smooth)

The Yellow Chewy Tube is used with a smaller jaw, typically infants and children up to 2 years old and individuals who cannot open the jaw very wide. The Yellow Chewy Tube features a narrow stem of 3/8″ OD.

Red (smooth)

The Red Chewy Tube is typically used with toddlers, older children and adults to provide a smooth surface for practicing biting and chewing skills. The Red Chewy Tube features a stem of ½” OD.

Green (knobby)

The Green Knobby Tube offers increased sensory input from the raised bumps along the bitable stem. It provides a slightly firmer bitable surface. The Green Knobby Tube features a stem of 9/16″ OD.

Blue (smooth)

The Blue Chewy Tube is the largest and firmest of the Chewy Tubes. It is intended for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities, autism or sensory integration disorders. The Blue Chewy Tube features a stem of 5/8″ OD.

Red Super Chew (knobby)

The Red Super Chew offers a solid yet bumpy surface for practicing biting and chewing skills. The closed loop handle is easily grasped by little fingers. The Red Super Chew features a stem of 9/16″ OD.

Green Super Chew (smooth)

The Green Super Chew offers a solid and smooth surface for practicing biting and chewing skills. The closed loop handle is easily grasped by little fingers. The Green Super Chew features a stem of ½” OD.

Ps and Qs

Ps & Qs provide a smooth and solid surface for practicing biting and chewing skills. The Q is wide enough for bilateral chewing activities and the P is especially easy to grasp by small fingers or those with low muscle tone.

Chewy Tube handles have corrugated ridges to assist the grasp – especially useful for those who are visually impaired.